|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Florida - February 13, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
Rawls v. Leon County, CASE NO. 1D07-3461,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 13, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In eminent domain proceeding, as engineer's testimony and resolution of board of county commissioners was sufficient to show necessity under § 73.021(1), Fla. Stat. (2007), the burden shifted to the landowner to show bad faith or abuse of discretion on the part of the county as an affirmative defense. As she failed to do so, the taking was proper.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Rubin v. Gabay, No. 4D06-5060,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 13, 2008, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Judgment in favor of client in securities fraud action was reversed; client failed to produce any evidence that broker acted as agent within meaning of § 517.211(2), Fla. Stat., such that he could be held liable under § 517.301, Fla. Stat., regarding IPO securities client purchased through another broker that turned out to be for sham corporations.
|
|
| |
SDG Dadeland Assocs. v. Anthony, No. 3D05-2666,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 13, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a slip and fall suit, as pedestrian's counsel in closing argument made a Golden Rule argument, expressed his own opinion, and made unsupported claims that owner and its counsel concealed evidence and presented perjured testimony and a frivolous defense, his conduct constituted fundamental error entitling the owner to a new trial.
|
|
| |
Schlagel v. Schlagel, Case No. 2D07-504,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 13, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Former wife with a law degree who had not looked for work for almost two years was properly imputed income of $ 40,000. But in view of 21-year marriage, she should have been awarded at least $ 1 per year in permanent, periodic alimony under § 61.08, Fla. Stat., in case she could not find employment, after using her best efforts, in imputed amount.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|