|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Florida - February 12, 2009
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Montgomery v. State, CASE NO. 1D07-4688,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 12, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the jury instruction imposed an additional element on the crime of manslaughter by act, an intent to kill, and that offense was one step removed from the crime for which defendant was convicted, second-degree murder, the conviction was reversed and remanded for a new trial.
|
|
| |
Mullins v. 7-Eleven, Inc., CASE NO. 1D08-1786,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 12, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Rupture of employee's breast implant was compensable under ¿ 440.02(19), Fla. Stat., as implant was a "prosthetic device" under that statute, but apportioning out medical benefits for implant's aged condition was error, as ¿ 440.15(5)(b), Fla. Stat., about apportionment, applied to diseases or diagnosis, and not "condition" of prosthetic device.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
