 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bowles v. State, No. SC05-2264, No. SC06-1666,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 14, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate who dropped a concrete block on the victim's head and strangled him was sentenced to death. As photos of the victim were relevant to support the State's argument of the applicability of the heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravator, appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim based on admission of the photos.
|
|||||
| Carter v. State, No. SC06-156,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 14, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was convicted of the simultaneous murders of his girlfriend, her other boyfriend, and her minor child, and was sentenced to death for the murder of the adults. It was not error to assign great weight to the burglary aggravator under § 921.141(3), Fla. Stat. (2002) as to adults and not child, as adults were defendant's targeted victims.
|
|||||
| Doorbal v. State, No. SC05-383, No. SC06-1490,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 14, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of death row inmate's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851 motion was affirmed; there was no basis for disqualifying the trial court from hearing the motion, no Brady or Giglio violations had occurred in the inmate's double murder trial, and denial of leave to amend the Rule 3.851 motion was proper as the motion was not timely filed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
