LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Florida - February 9, 2006

  
Banks v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-1885, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bozeman v. Higginbotham, CASE NO. 1D04-5081, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the clerk of the circuit court complied with the statutory requirements of Fla. Stat. § 197.522(1)(a) prior to issuing a tax deed to a homeowner, the homeowner's failure to receive notice of the same did not affect the tax deed's validity. Hence, the trial court erred by nullifying the tax deed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Burch v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-4702, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Davis v. State, CASE NO. 1D04-2785, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
F.W.G. v. Dep't of Children & Families, CASE NO. 1D05-5359, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Freeman v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-4944, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Amendments to Fla. Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.900(a), No. SC05-2154, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, February 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
King v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-4428, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Leveritt v. State, CASE NO.: 1D98-4519, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a criminal prosecution for DUI manslaughter, the trial court committed fundamental error by instructing the jury to make presumptions of impairment based on the blood alcohol test results under Fla. Stat. § 316.1934. Fla. Admin. Code Ann. r. 11D-8.012, the administrative rule implementing the implied consent statutes, was invalid.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Powell v. State, CASE NO. 1D04-5369, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 9, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because an order revoking community control and probation failed to: (1) specify what conditions were violated; (2) find that the probationer had the ability to pay restitution and costs; and (3) was based on a warrant signed after expiration of the community control period, said order was reversed, and the case was remanded for a redetermination.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.