 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Satchell v. Satchell, CASE NO. 1D06-1374,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 20, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court improperly awarded attorney's fees to wife related to husband's motion to determine child support arrearage and overpayment as Department of Revenue did not have to intervene to have post-dissolution proceeding constitute an action under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act; thus, § 61.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2001) disallowed such an award.
|
|||||
| Hill v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-3712,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 20, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hysmith v. Hysmith-Graham, CASE NO. 1D06-1210,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 20, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Madison v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-5188,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 20, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was improperly designated as co-counsel in his criminal prosecution as the trial court failed to conduct inquiry pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), and permitted defendant to perform "core function" of an attorney by allowing defendant to argue pretrial motion and what was, essentially, request for post-trial relief.
|
|||||
| State v. Griffin, CASE NO. 1D06-3154,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 20, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intermediate appellate court found that it was constrained by precedent, which it questioned and certified for review, to hold that deputies did not have probable cause under Fla. Const. art. 1, § 12 to search defendant's person after a police dog alerted to the presence of contraband or narcotics in defendant's car, in which defendant was alone.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
