 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pflaum v. Pflaum, CASE NO. 1D07-6102,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 19, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a son, in litigation over his mother's estate, had engaged in a protracted pattern of willful, persistent, and contumacious disregard and violation of court orders and intentional abuse of the judicial process, pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.410, he was prohibited from appearing before the appellate court unless represented by counsel.
|
|||||
| Watson v. State, CASE NO. 1D07-5090,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 19, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claims in inmate's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 motion were facially insufficient, but as Spera v. State had yet to be issued, the motion court did not allow him to amend his motion as required by Spera. But as the inmate did not raise Spera in his appeal of the denial of his motion, appellate court was not required to consider whether Spera applied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
