Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Florida - February 21, 2007
	Waters v. State, No. 4D07-162, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 21, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wellington Realty Co. Ltd. P'ship v. Colorall Techs. Int'l, Inc., No. 4D06-1597, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 21, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to a corporation as to a realty company's breach of contract action, as the trial court improperly found that the base year of occupancy of the building was 2002 for purposes of ad valorem tax payments under § 192.042(1), Fla. Stat. (1983), because the building was substantially completed in 2001. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wright v. State, No. 4D07-101, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 21, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Zuniga v. Eisinger, No. 3D06-1131, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 21, 2007, Opinion Filed View this case - free   Overview: Although plaintiffs argued that trial court erred in allowing the introduction of video deposition of county's director of traffic control, which included testimony regarding traffic signal reports and intersection timing data records, plaintiffs waived this argument on appeal, where they did not object to the admission of this hearsay evidence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.