Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Florida - February 18, 2009

  
Aime v. State, No. 4D07-1759, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Insufficient evidence existed to convict defendant of manslaughter with a firearm as first witness did not see defendant take anything from victim or possess gun and second witness's prior inconsistent statement that defendant took a necklace and had gun could not be sole evidence of guilt and had to comport with ? 90.801(2)(a), Fla. Stat.

Search Cases for Free

  
Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enters., LLC, No. 3D08-1066, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Temporary injunction barring stockholder from, inter alia, competing with LLC, usurping business opportunities, or using LLC's information and technology was defective because it failed to specify the reasons for its entry, and failed to describe in reasonable detail the act or acts to be restrained as required by Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610(c).

Search Cases for Free

  
Ball v. Ball, No. 4D08-1856, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Bell v. State, No. 3D07-2489, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Bunche v. State, No. 4D07-5007, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Harmless error occurred in burglary case as while trial court improperly allowed State's expert to testify as to process used for matching prints, which included verification by another examiner, in violation of ? 90.704, Fla. Stat. as question to expert that both people had to agree was improper bolstering, prints were admitted to be defendant's.

Search Cases for Free

  
Cadicamo v. Alite, Case No. 2D08-3832, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Capote v. State, No. 3D08-2559, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Caravel Invs., Inc. v. Walgreen Co., No. 3D07-1772, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
City of St. Pete Beach v. Sowa, Case Nos. 2D08-1674, 2D08-1676 CONSOLIDATED, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Companion v. City of Hollywood Police Officers' Ret. Sys., No. 4D08-570, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top