 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Def. Control United States, Inc. v. Atlantis Consultants Ltd. Corp., No. 3D08-1695,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Texas corporation's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was denied because the consultant which sued the corporation sufficiently alleged facts to support the consultant's claim that the corporation failed to make payments under a contract to the consultant in Florida so that jurisdiction existed under ¿ 48.193(1)(g), Fla. Stat.
|
|||||
| Ferrer v. State, No. 4D08-3027,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Figueroa v. State, Case No. 2D06-3201,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Greenberg Traurig, P.A. v. Bresnahan, No. 4D08-3392,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Halper v. State, No. 4D07-4015,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hebden v. Roy A. Kunnemann Constr., Inc., No. 4D07-3538,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly allowed set-off in construction contract dispute because homeowners' failure to allow access for contractor to make repairs was tantamount to rejection of contractor's settlement offer under ¿ 558.004(7), Fla. Stat., and the homeowners' failure to strictly comply the statute did not forfeit their right to offset damages.
|
|||||
| Herranz v. Siam, No. 3D08-1252,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. 4D08-4184,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. 4D08-1712,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
