 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sanchez v. State, No. 3D05-1321,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of inmate's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800 motion was affirmed. The inmate was attacking the factual basis for the 20-year mandatory minimum sentence he received and attacks on the factual basis for a sentence had to be brought under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. Under Rule 3.850, the motion was untimely.
|
|||||
| Slusser v. Life Care Ctrs. of Am., Inc., No. 4D07-2906,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A voluntary waiver of access to the courts to resolve claims arising under the Nursing Home Residents Act was valid. Had the legislature intended to stop parties from arbitrating their claims under the Act, it would have created an express prohibition.
|
|||||
| State v. Powell, No. 4D07-336,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in dismissing conspiracy to traffic in cocaine charge against defendant as trial court impermissibly weighed the evidence instead of reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. Further, on the evidence presented, the trial court erred in ruling that the State failed to present a prima facie case.
|
|||||
| State v. Rudy, No. 4D06-4924,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: 42 U.S.C.S. § 290dd-2 did not bar the State from using a probationer's treatment records at her probation violation hearing, as she signed release forms concerning records of her treatment (which she received as condition of probation), and a probation revocation proceeding was not equivalent to a criminal trial.
|
|||||
| Steil v. State, No. 4D06-3296,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a police officer testified that he did not have his lights and sirens on while chasing defendant, there was insufficient evidence of high speed or wanton disregard to support defendant's conviction of aggravated fleeing under § 316.1935(3), Fla. Stat. (2005).
|
|||||
| Tumblin v. State , No. 4D07-2285,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant should not have been convicted of both resisting an officer with violence and resisting an officer without violence, as both offenses arose from a single criminal episode. Convictions for both offenses violated his constitutional protection against double jeopardy.
|
|||||
| Watson v. State, No. 4D07-1555,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As § 776.051(1), Fla. Stat., regarding the use of force in resisting an arrest, did not apply where the original stop of an inmate was illegal, the inmate's convictions for battery on a law enforcement officer had to be vacated. However, as the verdict supported it, the inmate would be adjudicated guilty of misdemeanor battery.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, No. 3D07-2543,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, No. 3D08-61,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 20, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
