LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Florida - February 15, 2006

  
Miami-Dade County v. Cardoso, CASE NO. 3D05-313, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in awarding a seller damages based on negligence, as he failed to show impact or physical injury. Vacating the jury's damage award relating to negligence might have also affected the jury's award on the false arrest and/or imprisonment claims, so awards for both negligence and for false arrest and/or imprisonment were vacated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Monfiston v. State, No. 4D04-836, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Montgomery v. Wyatt, No. 4D05-548, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Morton v. Polivchak, Case No. 2D05-215, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: When a fraud claim was within the scope of an arbitration agreement, a claim for punitive damages based on that fraud was subject to arbitration, unless the parties agreed that punitive damages claims were not arbitrable. Thus, as the trial court erred by failing to address the arbitrability claim, an order compelling arbitration was reversed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nadeau v. State, No. 4D05-1403, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Northwest Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Ortiz, No. 4D04-2028, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Though mother was admitted to hospital in an emergency condition, as the hospital failed to give her notice under Fla. Stat. § 766.316 of its participation in Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation (NICA) Plan a reasonable time prior to delivery, although able to do so, the hospital lost the protection of NICA.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Obando v. Bradshaw, No. 4D05-3728, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied as Fla. 4th Jud. Dist. Admin. Order 4.001-6/01(IV)(C)(2), which required that defendant be released on his own recognizance where the charges against him were "no-filed" and then refiled, conflicted with Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131(j) and was null and void.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Orozco v. State, No. 4D05-622, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Having complied with all requirements in Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.692 and Fla. Stat. § 943.0585, defendant was presumptively entitled to an order sealing her criminal record absent a finding of a good reason for denial; therefore, the trial court erred in summarily denying defendant's motion to seal the record.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
R.M. Stark & Co. v. Spinks, No. 4D05-2147, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Reyes v. State, CASE NOS. 3D04-3282, 3D04-2677, COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 15, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate failed to establish his claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's failure to call inmate to testify at his suppression hearing and failure to investigate his claim that he was beaten by police before he confessed. Even if the confession had been suppressed, there was ample evidence of inmate's guilt.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.