|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Florida - February 22, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Humphrey v. State, Case No. 2D06-1093,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 22, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because records obtained from a cellular telephone company, which simply reflected the time, date, length, and location of a telephone call, were not communications falling within the purview of the husband-wife privilege in ? 90.504, Fla. Stat. (2003), the trial court correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress.
|
|
| |
|
| |
May v. State (In re May), Case No. 2D07-3965,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 22, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because civil commitment proceedings under the Jimmy Ryce Act, ch. 394, pt. V, Fla. Stat. (2007), implicated a petitioner's constitutionally recognized right to liberty, the proper vehicle for belated review of the order was to file a petition with the trial court for writ of habeas corpus and not a belated appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c).
|
|
| |
Mordenti v. State, Case No. 2D05-4407,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 22, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the trial court erred in excluding statements made by the murder victim's husband, who was also deceased at the time of trial, and because such statements, if believed by the jury, would exonerate defendant, defendant was entitled to a new trial.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback