 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Echeverria v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-6161,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 26, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Case was remanded for resentencing because defendant was never informed that a period of probation was to follow his plea agreement's period of incarceration. He also was not afforded the opportunity to withdraw his plea once the court determined that it would impose a period of probation in excess of the term of supervision in the plea agreement.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-4025,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 26, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions and sentences were reversed, and the case was remanded for a new trial because a police officer's testimony was fairly susceptible of being understood by the jury as a comment on defendant's right to remain silent, the testimony served to improperly shift the burden of proof onto defendant, and the error was not harmless.
|
|||||
| A.J. v. K.A.O., Case No. 5D06-3451,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 27, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Least restrictive means test applied to ch. 63, Fla. Stat. involuntary termination proceedings. In proceeding to terminate a father's parental rights pending a stepparent adoption there was sufficient evidence that termination was least restrictive means of protecting children, because, inter alia, father was serving 10 year prison sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
