|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Florida - February 28, 2007
|
| |
Alexander v. Alexander, No. 4D06-3694,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court properly denied mother's request to relocate with her children, as it found, pursuant to former § 61.13(2)(d), Fla. Stat., that while the quality of the mother's life might improve by the move, the children's lives would not, because they would lose their close family support from their father and their grandmothers.
|
|
| |
Alterra Healthcare Corp. v. Estate of Linton, CASE NO. 1D06-0986,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 28, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Provisions of an arbitration clause in a nursing home's residency agreement that eliminated punitive damages and capped noneconomic damages at $ 250,000 defeated the remedial purpose of the Florida Nursing Home Residents Act, Fla. Stat. tit. 29, ch. 400; therefore, the trial court properly found them void as against public policy.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Arthur v. Milstein, No. 4D07-715,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Decedent's last discernible wish as to disposition of her body was that she be buried in the Bahamas next to her son, and as trial court's finding in that regard was not essentially disputed, it controlled; thus, trial court was affirmed, even though it had erroneously relied on §§ 406.50(4), 497.005(37), Fla. Stat. in making its rulings.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Berkman v. Berkman, No. 3D05-2701,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 28, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Order requiring a father to pay $ 17,383.21 in child support arrearages was upheld on appeal, as courts could not nullify a support order issued in another state, and the amount of accrued arrearages pursuant to a Pennsylvania judgment was enforceable in Florida through the registration process, less any credits the father was entitled to receive.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|