 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| J.C. v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. (In the Interest of G.C.), Case Nos. 2D08-1409, 2D08-1416 CONSOLIDATED,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the parents remedied the lack of housing, which was the original reason why the children were first sheltered and then adjudicated dependent, their rights should not have been terminated under § 39.806(1)(e), Fla. Stat.
|
|||||
| Nicolas v. State, No. 3D06-3170,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Perdomo v. State, No. 3D09-132,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Plaut v. Norwegian Cruise Line, Ltd., No. 3D07-2089,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a cruise line's defense was based upon an injured person's admissions that she was not looking where she was going, the court did not abuse its discretion by denying her motion for new trial based upon an improper reference to a neighbor's statement as any impermissible suggestion before the jury was harmless under.§ 59.041, Fla. Stat.
|
|||||
| Richard Rd. Estates, LLC v. Miami-Dade County Bd. of County Comm'rs, No. 3D08-1400,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Continuing an agricultural zoning designation for owner's property resulted in impermissible "reverse spot zoning," because indisputable evidence was that (a) previous agricultural nature of area no longer prevailed, so that (b) surrounding property was now used as permitted either by estate zoning or, if anything, even more liberal zoning.
|
|||||
| Sanpedro v. State, No. 3D08-1143,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sibley v. Sibley, No. 3D06-1057,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Smith, Case No. 2D07-5999,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Walker, No. 4D08-838,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, February 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial judge erred in determining that the father had no standing based on § 744.301(1), Fla. Stat. because the father had formally acknowledged his paternity and acted as a father to the child in both an economic and emotional sense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
