 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Petion v. Bradshaw, No. 4D07-625,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for writ of habeas corpus to challenge the bond amount set for the charge against defendant of possession of cocaine with intent to sell was granted because under § 893.13, Fla. Stat., the degree of the crime of possession of cocaine was determined by the weight of the cocaine possessed, not the number of containers holding it.
|
|||||
| Alvarado v. Wackenhut Corp., CASE NO. 1D06-6001,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 6, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judge of Compensation Claims improperly appointed a neuropsychologist as an expert medical advisor (EMA) as Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 59A-30.002(10) defined an EMA as a "physician" but a neuropsychologist did not fall within the definition of physician in § 440.13(1)(r), Fla. Stat.
|
|||||
| James W. Windham Builders, Inc. v. Van Overloop, CASE NO. 1D06-657,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 6, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) incorrectly interpreted § 440.13(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004), the employer/carrier (E/C) did not properly investigate or inform a workers' compensation claimant or a doctor about the assisted care requirements; thus, the JCC properly found that the E/C was responsible for attendant care benefits.
|
|||||
| Mills v. State, CASE NO. 1D05-4833,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 6, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A ten-year habitual felony offender sentence was improperly imposed on defendant as § 775.084(1)(a)(3), Fla. Stat., specifically prohibited imposition of a habitual felony offender sentence for the charge of possession of a controlled substance; defendant had been convicted of possession of cocaine.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
