 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Drago v. State, No. 4D05-2321,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's claim that his blood would be found on a bedroom comforter was a significant piece of evidence to support his self-defense theory, and because the evidence would contradict the testimony of the State's witnesses, the trial court erred by summarily denying defendant's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.
|
|||||
| Estrada v. State, No. 4D07-329,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ford v. State, No. 4D06-2659,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Green v. State, CASE NO. 1D06-6414,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gulf Indus. v. Nair, No. 4D05-2433,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied an employer's motion for a mistrial and refused disclosure of a high-low agreement between the victim and his insurer because the agreement was not prohibited, introduction of the agreement into evidence would have been unnecessarily prejudicial, and disclosure of the agreement in the case would have been unwarranted.
|
|||||
| Hampton v. State, No. 4D06-3623,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no prejudice to the State, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it did not allow an inmate to withdraw a Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in its entirety and to refile it.
|
|||||
| Hartley v. McDonough, CASE NO. 1D06-3105,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hawker v. State, No. 4D05-808,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err by reversing a motion in limine ruling to allow an admission by an involuntary committee into evidence because the admission was relevant under § 90.401, Fla. Stat, as it tended to prove the likelihood of re-offense for purposes of the civil commitment. Additionally, no discovery violation resulted from the changed ruling.
|
|||||
| Heard v. State, CASE NO. 1D06-6715,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 7, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
