 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Leukel, Case No. 5D07-2031,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, February 29, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the plain language of § 948.08(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007), defendant--charged with driving while license revoked--had not committed a crime making him eligible for drug court. Thus, trial court abused its authority in permitting defendant to enter the drug court program under § 948.08(6)(a).
|
|||||
| White v. State, CASE NO. 1D07-4326,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, February 29, 2008, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying appellant's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 motion because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve weight-of-the-cocaine argument by motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380. Such a motion would have resulted in relief, given that a co-defendant prevailed on appeal with the same argument.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
