 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| E.D.P. v. State, Case No. 2D07-1730,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a juvenile proceeding, a restitution order regarding a firearm, a bicycle, and a laptop computer was reversed because the State failed to present evidence of the elements necessary to establish the fair market value of the items and because the trial court failed to make findings as to appellant's ability to pay restitution.
|
|||||
| Eisemann v. Eisemann, Case Nos. 2D08-192, 2D08-1308 CONSOLIDATED,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court wrongly found that increase in husband's alimony obligation was required on ground that wife's needs were not met in dissolution judgment as husband was unable to meet those needs. Original alimony award was based on settlement agreement, not following trial where trial court made findings of wife's needs and husband's inability to pay.
|
|||||
| Farnam v. US Sugar Corp., CASE NO. 1D08-3534,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fuentes v. Embro, Inc., CASE NO. 1D08-1720,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gonzalez v. State, Case No. 2D08-653,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kendricks v. State, CASE NO. 1D07-0512,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mondy v. State, Case No. 2D08-1133,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Morgan v. Morgan, CASE NO. 1D08-2696,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Peach State Roofing, Inc. v. 2224 South Trail Corp., Case Nos. 2D07-278, 2D07-1077 CONSOLIDATED,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 6, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was reversed as contract unambiguously required roofer to remove old roof system and install new roof system for firm, fixed price. Without finding of ambiguity, trial court erred in holding that contract included implied term based on custom and practice.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
