 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Emanuel v. State, No. 4D04-4494,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fluellen v. Law Offices of Fenstersheib & Fox, P.A., No. 4D05-1729,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ford v. State, No. 4D05-1329,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gallo v. Brady, No. 4D04-3571,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intended third party beneficiary of legal services was permitted to bring suit where testamentary intent as expressed in a will was frustrated by attorney's negligence and as a direct result, beneficiaries' legacy was lost or diminished. Summary judgment for lawyers in a claim alleging malpractice in estate planning for a decedent was error.
|
|||||
| Gateway Growers, Inc. v. Sch. Bd., No. 4D05-891,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a nursery operated its business on two separate and non-adjoining parcels of land, the business damages statute, Fla. Stat. § 73.071(3) (2004), did not apply. Hence, the trial court properly declined to submit the issues of compensation and business damages to the jury.
|
|||||
| Goldman v. Campbell, No. 4D04-4920,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The purpose of Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442(c)(1) was met where either the rule or Fla. Stat. § 768.79 was referenced in the proposal for settlement. A trial court erred in denying plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees even though, while the proposal referenced Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442, it did not cite the applicable statute, Fla. Stat. § 768.79.
|
|||||
| Graham v. Peter K. Yeskel 1996 Irrevocable Trust, No. 4D05-1100,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where owners' joint proposal for settlement did not apportion offer between them, proposal did not state amount and terms attributable to each party, as required by Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442(c)(3), and motion for attorney's fees was properly denied, despite fact that owners were sued on "single unified claim" directed at joint ownership of property.
|
|||||
| Graham v. State, No. 4D04-4406,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Fla. Stat. § 921.0021(5) precluded the inclusion in a sentencing scoresheet of juvenile offenses that occurred more than five years before the primary offense, and it was not clear that the same sentence would have been imposed with the correct calculation, defendant's Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2) motion should not have been denied.
|
|||||
| Grier v. State, CASE NO. 3D04-930,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant was charged with a single forcible felony, it was error to give a forcible felony instruction under Fla. Stat. § 776.041(1); the error was fundamental because it negated defendant's sole defense, was not harmless, and mandated reversal irrespective of an objection on defendant's part.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
