|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Florida - March 14, 2007
|
| |
A.K. v. Dobuler, No. 3D07-394,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 14, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Absent any basis under Florida law for the trial judge to hold a juvenile in secure detention for twenty-one days, and a failure to appear, standing alone, was insufficient, the juvenile's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was granted.
|
|
| |
Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. v. Minagorri, No. 3D06-3015,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 14, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over an Archdiocese employee's whistleblower claim under § 448.102(3), Fla. Stat. (2006) of the Private Sector Whistleblower Act, §§ 448.101-448.105, Fla. Stat. (2006), as the claim was barred by the First Amendment's prohibition against secular court review of religious policy and administration.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Castillo v. Castillo, No. 4D06-1833,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because competent, substantial evidence supported an award of primary residential custody in favor of the child's mother, and there was no requirement under § 61.13(3), Fla. Stat. (2005), that the trial court make specific written findings in a custody decision, said award was upheld on appeal.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|