|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Florida - March 14, 2007
|
| |
Lambert v. Lambert, No. 3D06-1445,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 14, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since it was evident that, under § 61.08(2), Fla. Stat., the trial court erroneously placed undue emphasis on the standard of living during the marriage when the former husband and the former wife shared their financial resources and income, the order of alimony was reversed where the former husband would only have been left with $ 1000 per month.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys. v. Revoredo, No. 3D05-2572,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 14, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a mortgage foreclosure action, an entity acting as a collection and litigation agent for current owner of notes and mortgages had standing, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.210(a), because although it was not the actual mortgagee, the entity was the only holder, by delivery, of the note.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Carter, No. 3D06-2030,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 14, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trial court erred in denying a motion to dismiss a wrongful death and product liability action based on forum non conveniens pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(a), as Tennessee was an adequate alternative forum, the private interest factors favored it, defendants were amenable to service there, and there was no significant connection to Florida.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
