 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Krueger v. Ponton, Case No. 5D08-1880,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The setting aside of a default judgment was reversed as the court erred in deeming the default judgment void under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b)(4). Instead, the judgment was "voidable" based on an alleged non-cognizable cause of action. The court also erred in concluding that the damages were unliquidated as they could be determined with exactness.
|
|||||
| Lanza v. Damian Carpentry, Inc., CASE NO. 1D08-2971,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a claimant was responsible for paying his attorney's fees and costs and his demand for settlement was for a sum certain, inclusive of fees and costs, the issue as to the amount of the attorney's fee was an issue between the claimant and his counsel.
|
|||||
| Latner v. Preusler & Assocs., Case No. 5D08-1780,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for a contractor was reversed and remanded because the trial court was left with a verdict awarding the contractor no damages on any theory which it claimed against the homeowners. In the absence of a proper and timely challenge to the verdict, the court had no choice but to enter judgment according to the verdict in favor of the owners.
|
|||||
| Merriel v. State, CASE NO. 1D07-4451,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction and sentence were affirmed because police officers did not violate defendant's rights in executing a search warrant for defendant's home, vehicles, and outbuildings by stopping defendant's car a block from his home in that they waited until he left his home as they believed that a small child and dangerous dogs were inside the home.
|
|||||
| Pringle v. State, Case No. 2D07-4733,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Reaves v. State, CASE NO. 1D08-5645,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, CASE NO.: 1D07-5953,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in convicting defendant of failing to comply with § 943.0435(4), Fla. Stat., sexual offender registration requirements; defendant did in fact advise local authorities that he would be located at a homeless shelter during the time he failed to establish a permanent or temporary residence, which satisfied § 943.0435(4)(b).
|
|||||
| Romerhaus v. Romerhaus, Case No. 2D08-1075,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schatz v. Haslup, Case No. 2D08-2825,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 13, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
