|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Florida - March 18, 2009
|
| |
Hingson v. MMI of Florida, Inc., Case No. 2D07-5215,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: While an employee did not recover all the commissions she sought, that did not alter her status as prevailing party under ? 448.08, Fla. Stat. She established that the employers breached the employment agreement and that she was entitled to damages. Thus, the employers were not entitled to fees.
|
|
| |
JP Morgan v. New Millennial, LC, Case No. 2D07-5937,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT, March 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As ? 701.02(1), Fla. Stat. did not apply, until a buyer and a creditor received satisfactions on record, they should have assumed that the mortgages were still in full force and effect in someone's hands. Thus, the trial court erred in concluding that they could avoid the mortgages just because the mortgagor failed to record the assignments.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
PS Capital, LLC v. Palm Springs Town Homes, LLC, No. 3D08-2511,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 18, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As a lender had commenced its collection suit before investors sought to add the lender as a party defendant in their case, and the preservation of litigation rights and alleged equity should not have been afforded to the investors at the expense of the lender, the investors should not have been allowed to intervene under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.230.
|
|
| |
Palm Beach Pain Mgmt., Inc. v. Carroll, No. 4D07-4240,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment for a president in a shareholder's suit alleging breach of fiduciary duty, civil theft, conversion, and constructive trust was error because both the president's and the shareholder's interpretations of the underlying contract were reasonable. As such, an ambiguity existed and summary judgment was not appropriate.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback