 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Amaya, No. 4D08-4678,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an incompetent criminal defendant did not meet the criteria for involuntary commitment under ¿¿ 916.13, 916.15, or 916.302, Fla. Stat. (2008), the Department of Children and Family Services (DCF) could not be made responsible for his care and supervision pursuant to ¿ 916.17, Fla. Stat. (2008); thus, DCF was entitled to certiorari relief.
|
|||||
| Fearon v. State, No. 4D07-244,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant could not be found guilty on three attempted premeditated murder counts and three attempted felony murder counts for same attempted killings as doing so violated double jeopardy principles; trial court did not avoid double jeopardy problem by entering judgment on both convictions and withholding sentence on the felony murder convictions.
|
|||||
| Fierro v. State, No. 3D06-2930,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the defense failed to assert the alleged sentencing error either at the sentencing hearing or within thirty days of rendition of the sentence pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l), the alleged error was not cognizable on direct appeal.
|
|||||
| First Home View Corp. v. Guggino, No. 3D08-1199,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ford Motor Co. v. Hall-Edwards, Nos. 3D08-2984 & 3D06-1656,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gielchinsky v. Vibo Corp., No. 3D08-2614,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Griffin v. State, No. 3D08-1652,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hampton v. State, No. 4D07-2893,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Heine v. Parent Constr., Inc., No. 4D08-428,
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT, March 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in applying economic waste doctrine to home buyer's to recover for construction defects in home contractor built; contractor did not intentionally breach the contract and cost of repair clause requiring contractor to correct nonconforming work did not extend to a situation requiring a complete tear down and rebuild.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
