 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In the Interest of M.H.W., A05A2205.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of a mother's parental rights was proper where, inter alia, trial court had earlier entered unappealed findings that children were deprived and without proper parental care and control, where mother failed to achieve many of goals of her reunification plan, and where children developed behavioral problems after mother's visits.
|
|||||
| King v. Goodwin, A05A1595.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under O.C.G.A. § 51-4-2(a), the decedent's son had right to bring a wrongful death action for his father's death and the estate administrator lacked standing to bring the claim. There was nothing to obviate consequences of son's failure to timely pursue the wrongful death action, and summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim was proper.
|
|||||
| King v. State, A05A1689.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury was entitled to find that a forged check was presented for cashing at defendant's behest, and that "uttering" element of first degree forgery was proven. Trial court properly charged jury on corroboration requirement, and there was evidence from which the jury could have concluded that friend involved in the transaction was not an accomplice.
|
|||||
| Magana-Gonzalez v. State, A05A2137.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to support robbery convictions where the victim testified that defendant threatened him with a knife and then threw the knife on his bed, an officer found a knife lying on the bed, and defendant admitted to holding a knife while arguing with victim. It was inconsequential that defendant never touched victim with the knife.
|
|||||
| Senior v. State, A05A2228.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's possession of an antique shotgun while a convicted felon was sufficient to sustain a conviction under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-131, as the State was not required to additionally prove that the gun was operational at the time defendant possessed it.
|
|||||
| Wegman-Fakunle v. State, A05A2303.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Photos of medicine boxes which defendant tried to steal were properly admitted where the store manager testified that she took photos of boxes that an employee testified were in defendant's purse, and that photos fairly and accurately represented what those items looked like. Defendant testified that photos depicted type of medicine that she got.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
