 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dumas v. State, A06A1819.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly denied a new trial, as: (1) the evidence supported his convictions, (2) separate convictions for armed robbery and hijacking a motor vehicle did not violate double jeopardy, (3) the State properly asked leading questions of its witness, and (4) counsel was not ineffective in failing to file a futile suppression motion.
|
|||||
| Anderson v. Mergenhagen, A06A1752.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the trial court properly denied appellant partial summary judgment on her stalking claim, given that appellee denied the intent required for the same, and properly quashed a subpoena for appellee's cell phone records, as such would not have led to admissible evidence, material fact issues existed on appellant's invasion of privacy claim.
|
|||||
| Rice v. Cannon, A06A2449.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly dismissed a pro se complaint pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 9-11-37(d) on grounds that plaintiffs wilfully failed to appear for their depositions, as the court's failure to rule on their pending motions did not excuse their attendance. Further, the action was properly transferred, and recusal of the new judge was unwarranted.
|
|||||
| Parker v. State, A06A1813.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two child molestation convictions were upheld on appeal, as defendant waited too long to assert that his constitutional speedy trial rights had been violated, and failed to show prejudice from any delay; similar transaction evidence was properly admitted; and the two counts did not merge for the purposes of sentencing.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
