 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wilburn v. State, A05A2280.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since a witness saw defendant holding a crowbar with blood smeared "all over him" and his hair "puffed out" with blood and tissue hanging in it, and a pawn shop manager testified that the victim's router was pawned by defendant, there was competent evidence to support defendant's convictions for, inter alia, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
|
|||||
| Yemane v. State, A05A2233.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of the motion to suppress was not error as there was some evidence to support the trial courts finding that consent to search was given. The trial court chose to disbelieve defendants witness and to believe the testimony of the police officers that they received consent to enter and to check the apartment.
|
|||||
| Young v. Oak Leaf Builders, Inc., A05A1920.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the evidence was in conflict, the issue of waiver of a breach of contract claim had to be decided by a jury. Under the circumstances, a jury could reasonably find that the property owners did not intend to waive their right to demand workmanlike performance by proceeding with the closing and resulting payment to the construction company.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
