 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Autry v. State, A05A1777.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search of a van was lawful under the independent basis of the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement since the objective facts known to the deputy after he lawfully stopped the van gave him probable cause to believe that the van contained contraband. Thus, the motion to suppress the evidence was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Bentley v. State, A05A2058.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because making a bomb threat did not unambiguously reflect on a child victim's credibility, honesty, or imagination, was not related to the victim's testimony, and was not material to the issues on trial, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the defense to introduce the evidence under O.C.G.A. § 24-2-2.
|
|||||
| Burnham v. State, A05A1826.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a prosecution of defendant for driving under the influence of alcohol, the trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the results of a field and chemical sobriety test; police officer had an articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify a stop of defendant's vehicle.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of C.L.C., A05A1657.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under O.C.G.A. § 15-11-94(b)(4)(A), evidence that father used and sold drugs, abused his children, was paranoid, delusional, schizoid and narcissistic; that children were fearful of being reunited with him; and that deprivation was likely to continue, supported court's finding that terminating his parental rights was in children's best interest.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. 72 Riverside Invs., LLC, A05A1954.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, January 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in entering judgment permitting judgment creditor to execute on an underlying judgment that judgment creditor obtained against judgment debtor; no error occurred because trial court's written order conformed to its oral order and judgment creditor did not have to prove judgment debtor owned patent or patent applications.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
