Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Georgia - March 1, 2007
	Paul & Suzie Schutt Irrevocable Family Trust v. NAC Holding, Inc., A06A2323, COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 1, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Because a Delaware appraisal action was a trust's exclusive remedy after the trial court refuse to enjoin a merger, and no further factual allegations were needed to survive the corporation's motion to dismiss the trust's amended complaint, said dismissal was upheld on appeal. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Brookbank, A06A2036., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 1, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court erred in suppressing defendant's refusal to submit to a breath test, as the implied consent notice given was substantially accurate and timely given, and irrespective of whether the refusal resulted from defendant's confusion, it nevertheless remained a refusal. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Walsh v. State, A06A2060., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 1, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: When defendant gave one bill to a bartender and had a bill with the same serial number in his wallet, and the bartender, an officer, and a detective testified as to the chain of custody of the bills and as to the bills' physical characteristics, there was sufficient evidence for defendant's forgery convictions under O.C.G.A. §§ 16-9-1 and 16-9-2. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.