|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Georgia - March 2 - March 5, 2007
|
| |
Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc. v. Garrison Ridge Shopping Ctr. Marietta, GA, L.P., A07A0372.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: As a lessee had a license concerning a sign, made improvements in reliance on the same, and a second lessee took ownership of the property with actual notice of the sign, the lessee was entitled to an interlocutory injunction barring the second lessee from interfering with the sign. The fact that the lessee did not own the land was irrelevant.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Marwede v. EQR/Lincoln L.P., A06A2379.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a partnership was not required to answer, was not in default, and was added by amendment to a pedestrian's personal injury suit, the trial court did not err in opening the default judgment entered. Further, as a fact issue arose on a scope of employment issue, a directed verdict was properly denied and the jury was properly charged.
|
|
| |
Milum v. Banks, A06A2394.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Verdict awarding general damages to an attorney, in his libel action against a former client, was upheld, as the jury could reasonably conclude that the attorney was a limited public figure, and was properly charged on the same; no error resulted in granting the attorney's motion in limine, and the evidence did not support a verdict for the client.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|