 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carpenter v. Sun Valley Props., LLC, A06A1945,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of apartment building owner in personal injury action by invitee was reversed; material fact question existed as to whether owner had been relieved of its O.C.G.A. § 51-3-1 duty to invitee, and if not, whether independent contractors were negligent in installing a railing that broke such that the owner's duty was breached.
|
|||||
| Chambers v. State, A06A2461.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because no fatal variance concerning the location where the charged burglary offense occurred was presented in the indictment, and defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims lacked merit, the trial court did not err in denying his motions for both a directed verdict and a new trial.
|
|||||
| Harrell v. Fed. Nat'l Payables, Inc., A06A2305.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the trial court did not erroneously enter a contempt order against two guarantors that was self-executing, because it ordered their incarceration for failing to comply with post-judgment discovery without affording them notice and an opportunity to be heard, in violation of their due process rights, the order of incarceration was reversed.
|
|||||
| Hedquist v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., A06A1785.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The first of three opinions had not been rendered a nullity so that it could not serve as the law of the case on remand. It was clear from the language of the third opinion and the appellate context that the court intended to reverse the first opinion only insofar as it was inconsistent with the ruling of the supreme court in the second opinion.
|
|||||
| Patterson v. State, A06A2330,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's aggravated stalking convictions were upheld on appeal, as he knew he was to have no contact with the victim, but persistently refuse to abide by a protective order, a lesser-included offense instruction was not supported by the evidence, his trial counsel was not ineffective, and no error resulted in the sentence imposed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
