 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ruppert v. State, A07A0590,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence to support defendant's convictions of theft by taking under O.C.G.A. § 16-8-2. Records showed that defendant had received payments but never credited them to the business he managed, and he had made a loan to a fictitious person, then issued a check that was purportedly endorsed and cashed by the fictitious person.
|
|||||
| State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., A06A2429.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insurer had not shown that it was entitled under O.C.G.A. § 9-4-2 to a declaratory judgment that a second insurer had to defend an estate against a personal injury lawsuit. The first insurer had conceded that it was obligated to defend the estate itself, and it had not demonstrated sufficient uncertainty to authorize a declaratory judgment.
|
|||||
| Walter R. Thomas Assocs. v. Media Dynamite, Inc., A06A1792.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When plaintiff purchased advertising time from media providers on behalf of defendant, invoices received from the media providers and kept by plaintiff as part of its own records were business records of plaintiff under O.C.G.A. § 24-3-14(b), and testimony from plaintiff's president could lay a foundation for their introduction into evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
