Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Georgia - March 29, 2006
	Board of Regents of the Univ. Sys. v. Doe, A05A1892., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 29, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: While the trial court properly found the existence of a valid, written employment contract between a university's board of regents and an applicant, based on the conduct of the parties, summary judgment was reversed, as jury issues remained as to whether the Board breached that contract. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Pilcher v. Stribling, A05A2064., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 29, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Fire chief was properly held accountable under O.C.G.A. § 16-5-92 for his non-consensual acts of harassment and intimidation against his employees, and those adversely affected by the same, with exception only as to one employee, who failed to testify that he feared for his safety. Further, no evidence supported the trial judge's recusal. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Rampey v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., A05A2321. A05A2322., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 29, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In a declaratory judgment action regarding the extent of a business's insurance coverage, a fact issue remained as to whether the bookkeeper acted within the scope of her employment when she operated the stove, which caused the fire at issue. Whether she was in control of the damaged property could not be determined as a matter of law. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.