|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Georgia - March 30, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Adams v. Carlisle, A05A1836. A05A1837. A05A1838.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In three suits arising out of allegations of two shoppers passing counterfeit bills, summary judgment was properly granted to the arresting officers and as to claims of negligence and slander, but was reversed as against two mall employees, the mall, a mall merchant, and two security guards on the shoppers' remaining intentional tort claims.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In the Interest of J.K., A05A1789.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Findings were sufficient to terminate mother's parental rights pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 15-11-94 where, inter alia, mother did not financially support her children, even when able to do so, failed to bond with the children, was unable to care for the children due to dependency on prescription medication, and was unwilling to undergo treatment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. Micro Corp. v. Atlantix Global Sys., LLC, A05A2130, A05A2131.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where reseller, which sued LLC in prior case, did not represent corporation which sued LLC in present case, collateral estoppel did not bar corporation's claims against LLC based on resolution of prior case in favor of LLC. Reliance on retraction letters in prior case did not bar LLC's assertion of truth as defense in present defamation case.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|