LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Georgia - May 8, 2007

  
Breland v. State, A07A0107., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence surrounding the events on the night the crimes were committed, as well as the history of past abuse defendant suffered, supported a finding of provocation to uphold defendant's voluntary manslaughter and other convictions. Further, absent notice of any mental health problems, counsel was not ineffective in seeking a mental evaluation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Carpenter v. State, A07A0634., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Counsel was not ineffective for failing to move to suppress defendant's videotaped statement, as it was consistent with defendant's justification theory and allowed the jury to hear evidence that was unfavorable to the victim. As the prosecutor's closing argument was not improper, counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to it.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Curtis v. State, A07A1038., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: As the trial court properly instructed the jury in the prosecution of a mother and her daughter of crimes arising from the battery and obstruction of a police officer, their convictions were upheld. Further, as the state properly tracked the language of the governing statutes, no fatal variance in the accusation resulted.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Duggan v. State, A07A0205., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Given the testimony by three witnesses as to defendant's direct involvement as a participant in the crimes, his convictions were upheld. Further, as counsel's preservation of his right to make the final closing argument was part of a sound trial strategy in not impeaching a witness, and alternative impeachment methods showed bias, he was effective.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Garrett v. State, A07A0296., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because defendant waived any discovery violation and best evidence issue, res gestae testimony offered by the victim about the rape was proper, defendant's requested jury charge as to the kidnapping charge was incorrect, and trial counsel was not ineffective in the way he handled his representation, defendant's convictions were upheld on appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Harper v. State, A07A0181., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: As sufficient evidence supported defendant's convictions of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and giving a false name and date of birth to a law enforcement officer, because the argument raised on appeal challenging the denial of his suppression motion was not raised at trial, it was not reviewed for the first time on appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In the Interest of A.B., A07A0452, COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In light of a mother's failure to comply with the safety plans designed to provide the parental care or control necessary for her youngest child's physical, mental, or emotional health or morals, and the prior proceedings involving the mother's older children, a deprivation finding and entry of a protective order against the mother were affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In the Interest of S.S.G.A., A07A0285. A07A0286., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Termination of parental rights pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 15-11-94 was upheld; a rational factfinder could have found by clear and convincing evidence as to the mother that the conditions of the children's deprivation were likely to continue, and the father's history of chronic, unrehabilitated drug abuse and incarcerations supported termination.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jaheni v. State, A07A0193., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: With regard to defendant's convictions for armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle, and other felony offenses, O.C.G.A. § 16-1-7(b) was not violated nor was defendant's right against double jeopardy since traffic offenses occurring from the same incident for which he was convicted in a separate court involved entirely separate elements.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McCoy v. State, A07A0011., COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because probable cause supported defendant's arrest, suppression of his statement was unwarranted. Further, the evidence did not support striking a juror for cause, defendant waived any irregularity in the verdict, counsel was not ineffective, and defendant's right to counsel was not violated when counsel was ordered to continue his representation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.