 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Donaldson v. State, A06A0814.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since, in cross-examining a friend of defendant, defense counsel engaged in questioning about, inter alia, defendant's church attendance, and since only purpose of these questions was to elicit testimony about defendant's character, trial court properly allowed evidence of previous license suspensions and insurance cancellations as rebuttal.
|
|||||
| Estes v. State, A06A0495.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a child molestation case, defendant conceded the admissibility of a prior victim's mother's testimony, under Ga. Unif. Super. Ct. R. 31.3(B) by calling her. Counsel was not ineffective for not objecting to the State's responses to specific defense claims, nor for calling a witness, in the hope that the jury would find her testimony incredible.
|
|||||
| Hill v. State, A06A0755.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that defendant gave his custodial statements freely and voluntarily was not clearly erroneous. Fact that the officer failed to give a Miranda warning that specifically notified defendant that he was going to be questioned about an armed robbery, instead of just outstanding bad check charges, did not render the statement inadmissible.
|
|||||
| Jordan v. State, A06A0644.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: O.C.G.A. § 42-8-34.1(c) placed a two-year limitation on the period of confinement which may be ordered when probation was revoked because of a violation of a general provision of probation. Trial court's revocation order, which could possibly have been construed as ordering more than two years in confinement, was improper.
|
|||||
| McLain v. Mariner Health Care, Inc., A06A0923.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Nursing home resident belonged to class Medicare and Medicaid statutes were designed to protect, and alleged injuries were among those which statutes and regulations were designed to prevent. Thus, dismissal of negligence per se and negligence causes of action against nursing home arising from the treatment of nursing home resident was error.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
