|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Georgia - May 19, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Majeed v. Randall, A06A0576.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Allegations of fraud and perjury, made in a one sentence and pro se civil complaint, were properly dismissed as time-barred, lacking in specificity and factual allegations, and due to many procedural and legal oversights and errors. Furthermore, said complaint lacked any statement of jurisdiction and prayer for relief.
|
|
| |
|
| |
North Metro Directories Publ'g, LLC v. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co., A06A0173.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an insurer's declaratory judgment action on the issue of whether it had the duty to defend its insurer, the trial court erred in construing the policy, and a fact question remained as to an issue of slander, making summary judgment inappropriate. But, the insurer was not required to provide specific, unambiguous reasons for denying coverage.
|
|
| |
Quintero v. State, A06A0712.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Admission of evidence of prior difficulties between defendant and the victim, his wife, which showed state of relationship between defendant and victim and was relevant to show his abusive bent of mind toward her, was proper in trial of charges of, inter alia, kidnapping and false imprisonment arising out of defendant's assault of his wife.
|
|
| |
Toombs v. Meyer M. Cardin Living Trust #2, A06A0642, A06A0643.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, May 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Dismissal of a husband and wife's wrongful disclosure claim against a trust, which held the note and the security deed on their property, was upheld on appeal, as the husband and wife failed to demonstrate any legal error. But, because the interests and attorney fee award did not match the undisputed evidence in the record, such was reversed.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|