|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Georgia - June 5 - June 6, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Rogers & Sons, Inc. v. Santee Risk Managers, LLC, A06A0757.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, June 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since before fire which destroyed covered equipment, the insured's president learned what his obligation was under insurance company's fire extinguisher requirement, but did not tell anyone that his earlier confirmation that equipment had required extinguisher was false, policy was void and denial of insured's property damage claim was proper.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Confidential Bonding Co. v. State of Ga., A06A1510, A06A1511, A06A1512, A06A1513.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since a surety on four criminal bonds did not pay the judgments on its forfeited bonds, O.C.G.A. § 17-6-72(d)(3), allowing reduction, controlled. Since the individuals were all arrested by county authorities without any involvement of the surety, the surety failed to show that it was entitled to a remission of the bonds.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Spradlin v. State, A06A1122.,
COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: While defendant, a passenger in a truck seen at burglary scene, and the truck driver, both claimed that defendant was passed out while the driver committed burglary without defendant's knowledge, testimony from other witnesses indicated that two men were involved, and sufficient evidence supported conviction of burglary, O.C.G.A. § 16-7-1.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|