 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., NO. 27489,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Grandinetti v. Cayetano, NO. 27640,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Groves v. Outrigger Hotels Haw., NO. 27448, NO. 27563,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re N. M-O, NO. 27361, NO. 27362,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Birano, NO. 25699,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's right to cross-examination, Sixth Amendment, was not violated where even if the potential to cross-examine the witness had been fully realized, the only material difference between defendant's testimony and the testimony of other witnesses was defendant's "claim of right" defense, which did not apply to the robbery charges.
|
|||||
| Vestin Mortg., Inc. v. Alternative Debt Portfolios, L.P., NO. 27440,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Camp v. Camp, NO. 26452,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Entry of divorce was reversed and the divorce action was ordered dismissed as of the date of a husband's death because even though the court concluded all but ministerial work at the time of his death, under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 580-45, divorce decree entered after his death did not state it was effective on a date other than the date of its entry.
|
|||||
| Pao v. Chung, NO. 25965,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In plaintiff's civil action against a doctor and medical clinic, plaintiff had no right to effective assistance of counsel because that right applied to criminal actions only. Also, plaintiff failed to support his claim that doctor's attorney blocked his view of witnesses; thus court disregarded the argument as provided in Haw. R. App. P. 28(b)(7).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
