 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Eisermann v. Wilkerson, NO. 28216,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was dismissed as premature as order appealed from was not appealable final order under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 641-1(a) (2005), Haw. R. Civ. P. 58, and case law because circuit court had not yet entered an appealable final default judgment against defendant and had not reduced its order dismissing case for lack of prosecution to writing.
|
|||||
| Fukusaku v. State, NO. 26149,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Estate of Damon, NO. 28147,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kuster v. Kepio, NO. 28211,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was dismissed as premature as the circuit court's language, that there were no further issues in dispute as to any party, was not the language needed for certification under Haw. R. Civ. P. 54(b) and it did not satisfy the requirements for appealable final judgment under Haw. R. Civ. P. 58, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 641-1(a), and case law.
|
|||||
| Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au, NOS. 26517 & 28323,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney's petition for reinstatement to the practice of law was denied as premature because, insofar as the petition was governed by Haw. R. Sup. Ct. 2.17, the attorney was not entitled to relief pursuant to Haw. R. App. P. 21(e), because less than one-half of the period of his five-year suspension had expired.
|
|||||
| State v. Laysa, NO. 27735,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Murray, NO. 27549,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fact that the physical abuse occurred within two years of a second or subsequent conviction of abuse of family or household members was admissible during defendant's trial for abuse of family or household members under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 709-906(1), (7) (2005) because it was an intrinsic fact that had to be determined by the jury.
|
|||||
| State v. Pilon, NO. 27432,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Rippe, NO. 28225,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although State's appeal from suppression order was authorized under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 641-13(7) (Supp. 2005), it was not timely filed under Haw. R. App. P. 4(b)(1) and State's motion for reconsideration was not authorized by Haw. R. Penal P. 47 so it did not constitute "good cause" for extension of time for filing appeal under R. 4(b)(5).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
