LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Hawaii - January 27 - January 31, 2006

  
Buena Vista Investors, LLC v. Schmidt, NO. 27479, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cooper v. State, NO. 26225, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where petitioner was convicted on a guilty plea to murder in the second degree, the court properly denied his Haw. R. Penal P. 40 petition seeking release from custody. His guilty plea was not involuntary; parole eligibility did not entitle him to withdraw his guilty plea; and counsel's performance did not reflect a lack of skill.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Schmidt v. Judges of the Third Circuit Court of Hawai'i, NO. 27678, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sierra Club v. Office of Planning, NO. 26174, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in vacating the land use commission's grant of a land classification as the proposed project requiring reclassification constituted an action that triggered the requirement for an environmental assessment under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 343-5 (1993) because it was a "project to be initiated" by a landowner and a business.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Alvarez, NO. 26725, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bednarz v. State, NO. 26578, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Doe Children, NO. 26112, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a father did not challenge on appeal the grounds for the divestiture of his parental rights, under Haw. R. App. P. 28(b)(7), the father had no parental rights when the Department of Human Services made its post-trial placement of the father's children with his deceased wife's family.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Gaines, NO. 26512, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant was charged with violating an order for protection under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 586-11, the State did not withhold a statement made by defendant in violation of Haw. R. Penal P. 16(b)(1)(ii). Defendant was not harmed by the State's closing argument; all improper comments were stricken from the record.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Joseph, NO. 27001, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court properly suppressed defendant's statements, Haw. Const. art. I, § 10, because he was in custody, no Miranda warnings were given prior to the pre-interview being conducted, and the pre-interview statements were exploited in that defendant was subsequently questioned on the same matter in order that he would repeat his earlier statement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tokairin v. Kameda, NO. 24700, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In shareholders' derivative suit which resulted in a settlement agreement with the directors, the trial court erred in denying the directors' motion for reconsideration or clarification of the trial court's order as the material terms of the agreement were facially ambiguous, as was the trial court's order regarding enforcement of the agreement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.