 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Aig Haw. Ins. Co., NO. 25035,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Keaweehu, NO. 26189,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's drug case, dog-sniff evidence was erroneously admitted because, without some evidence showing that the money was not contaminated by the police, the State failed to lay a sufficient foundation for admission under Haw. R. Evid. 702; however, the error was harmless because the money and drugs were recovered from defendant's car.
|
|||||
| State v. Shimabukuro, NO. 26951,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was charged with, inter alia, promoting dangerous drug in third degree in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1243(1), court did not err in granting his motion to suppress; his unlawful detention lead to the discovery of a pipe and residue during pat-down incident to his arrest authorized by warrants discovered during that detention.
|
|||||
| State v. Emerson, NO. 26097,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Nakata analysis did not unequivocally demonstrate society demanded persons charged with refusing to provide ingress or egress under Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 852 (1993 and 2004), be afforded the right to a jury trial as the crime was presumptively petty; the maximum punishment was 30 days in jail and a $ 200 fine and there was no such common law offense.
|
|||||
| State v. Nichols, NO. 26870,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Santarone, NO. 26760,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In review of defendant's conviction for unauthorized control of a propelled vehicle and driving without a license, trial court properly refused to suppress seized evidence, which was a truck and fruits of the truck's search, because defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the seized truck.
|
|||||
| State v. Tavares, NO. 25989,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in suppressing glass pipe with residue that police officer saw on ground next to where defendant was seated after car in which he was riding was stopped and statement relating to the pipe as fruits of an illegal detention; seizure of defendant was lawful and he was not under arrest when he made incriminating statements about pipe.
|
|||||
| State v. Bolosan, NO. 26306,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In trial for drug offenses, which included possessing methamphetamine, possessing marijuana, and manufacturing methamphetamine, State laid proper foundation for chemist's testimony because foundation could be laid, pursuant to Haw R. Evid. 703, by showing, through policies and procedures, that lab machines were in good working order.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
