LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Hawaii - February 2 - February 5, 2007

  
Dominguez v. O'Brien, NO. 27469, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In legal practitioner's suit against an attorney alleging defamation and fraud, circuit court did not err in granting attorney's motion for summary judgment because practitioner failed to show a triable issue of fact as to whether attorney defamed practitioner, and the practitioner failed to show pecuniary damages.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au, NO. 26517, NO. 28323, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Golojuch, NO. 27629, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was convicted of theft in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-833(1); claim that there was insufficient evidence to show an intent to deprive candidate of campaign signs was rejected because officer had confronted defendant earlier about taking down signs. Defendant was informed of the proper procedure if signs were abandoned.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Arcebal-Rabang v. Querubin, NO. 27770, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Ancheta, No. 26750, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion to reconsider the denial of motion to withdraw a no-contest plea was properly denied because he failed to show that withdrawing his plea to theft was necessary to correct manifest injustice under Haw. R. Penal P. 32(d); plea colloquy satisfied requirements of Haw. R. Penal P. 11(c)(4) and advised defendant of right to jury trial.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Barona, NO. 27702, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Owens, No. 27714, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, February 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Although Haw. R. Penal P. 9 required that defendant's bench warrant for a probation violation under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-627 be served without unnecessary delay, his probation violation caused periods of necessary delay in serving the warrant because he would have been served with a motion for revocation and a warrant would have been unnecessary.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.