 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Harding v. Richmond, NO. 26957,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court vacated an order for protection entered against the respondent where the trial court entered the order in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 586-3 by entering the order without permitting respondent to cross-examine petitioner and call witnesses and present evidence in his defense.
|
|||||
| Springer v. Springer, NO. 26758,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband could not complain about the family court's noncompliance with Haw. Fam. Ct. R. 52(a), because the husband did not comply with Haw. R. App. P. 10(f).
|
|||||
| Hart v. Hart, NO. 26073,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother sought, under Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), interstate enforcement and modification of child support provisions of a New York divorce decree, family court in Hawai'i did not have jurisdiction over father residing in Florida because the mother chose neither of the two paths available under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 576B-301(c).
|
|||||
| Meuse v. Tucker-Meuse, NO. 26701,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parents' failure to abide by divorce decree was a material change in circumstance authorizing a change of custody/visitation orders; thus, court did not err in granting mother's motion for sole legal custody of children and permission to relocate to mainland with them because it was in their best interests pursuant to Haw. Rev. Stat. § 571-46.
|
|||||
| Cooper v. State, NO. 26225,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nishida v. State, NO. 27760,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Olson v. Puhalauoo, NO. 26119,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Elicker, NOS. 26354 & 26498,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-646 court was not barred from ordering restitution to State for repairs for damage caused by defendant's escape, it erred by not entering findings and conclusions specifically illustrating defendant could afford to pay restitution of $ 3,149 and a fine of $ 10,000 pursuant to Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-641(3), (4).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
