 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Haw. v. Allison, NO. 28122,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hutch v. State, NO. 28101,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hutch v. State, NO. 28034,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hutch v. State, NO. 28102,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hutch v. State, NO. 28104,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In reAdoption of Female Minor Child, NO. 28103,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In the Interet of A.G., NO. 27637,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stepfather was not family member required to be summoned under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 587-32(a) and family court had not erred in finding he was not a necessary party to contested permanent plan hearing as he was neither legal nor natural father of child, and in awarding department of human services' (DHS) motion for order awarding permanent custody.
|
|||||
| Rees v. Carlisle, No. 26998,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecutor's promoting a "direct filing" bill was improper because the powers granted to the attorney general in Haw. Rev. Stat. § 28-10.6 did not apply; there was no mention of a city or county prosecutor in the statute, and the prosecutor's conduct went far beyond providing information on how the criminal justice system could be improved.
|
|||||
| Sarkar v. Sarkar, NO. 28154,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
