 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re S.D., NO. 27636,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Nakkim, NO. 27682,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Sax, NO. 27165,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Black v. Pollack, NO. 25725,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a partition action, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 668-1, a court was duty bound to protect the minority interests of defendants by securing the highest possible price, and therefore, the court did not err by reopening bidding inasmuch as plaintiff was not vested with any interest in the properties until the sale had been confirmed by the circuit court.
|
|||||
| State v. Giese, NO. 25477,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err in denying defendant's motion to withdraw a no contest plea to one count of terroristic threatening, in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-717, because court legitimately balanced defendant's claim of harm against substantial prejudice faced by the prosecution in prosecuting charges arising from an incident nine years in the past.
|
|||||
| State v. Waialae, NO. 27252,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction of abuse of family and household members under Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 709-906 was vacated and remanded because defendant was denied the ability to effectively cross-examine the complaining witness to establish a record from which to argue why the witness might have been biased.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
