 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McRae v. State, NO. 26876,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The circuit court did not err by denying petitioner's request for Haw. R. Penal P. 40 relief without a hearing. The circuit court found that his petition was without merit, patently frivolous, and without a trace of support in the record. Petitioner should have raised his claims in the prior petition for post-conviction relief.
|
|||||
| McRae v. State, NO. 26878,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly denied petitioner postconviction relief without a hearing where there was no merit to his claim that unnamed "prison staff" had made an error in determining the expiration of his sentence.
|
|||||
| Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tomasa, NO. 27792,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 1 year and 1 day for violating Haw. Prof. Conduct R. 1.1, 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a), 1.4(b), 1.15(f)(3), 1.15(f)(4), 1.16(a), 1.16(d), 3.2, and 8.4(a) for, inter alia, failing to provide client with written statement accounting for legal services billed at $2,500 and failing to formally withdraw when withdrawal was appropriate.
|
|||||
| Scheller v. Scheller, NO. 26809,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce proceeding, part of an order relating to property and debt was vacated because debts were improperly calculated, attorney's fees were improperly rounded off, and an equalization payment calculation was erroneous.
|
|||||
| State v. Carineo, NO. 26720,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Vincent, NO. 26255,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Virtudes v. State, NO. 27460,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
