 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Sale, No. 26293,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a stolen vehicle case, the court properly prohibited defendant from calling a witness in order to have him assert his Fifth Amendment privilege because the jury might have inferred that the witness was responsible for stealing the car and thus concealed the car's stolen status, and the State could not have cross-examined the witness.
|
|||||
| State v. Smith, NO. 26829,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inter alia, during defendant's trial for Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-701.5 second degree murder, court did not abuse its discretion by permitting testimony about defendant's statement, "Do you want me to drop that baby over the balcony," which was uttered 7 weeks before baby's death as court provided limiting instructions to jury on several occasions.
|
|||||
| State v. Yoo, NO. 26567,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Clay v. McKenna, NO. 27777,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Ellen K. & William T. Robinson Trust, NO. 26786,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly held that upon termination of a trust, trustee was to distribute trust estate equally among settlors' grandchildren per capita because had settlors intended grandchildren to take corpus per stirpes, they would have used similar language as in income distribution provision; settlors clearly knew how to effect per stirpes distribution.
|
|||||
| Kahooilihala v. Hifo, NO. 27834,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Kaahanui, NO. 26390,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no reasonable possibility that any error in a trial court's permissive-inference-of-knowledge instruction, proposed by defendant, might have contributed to defendant's conviction of theft in the second degree, in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 708-830(8) (Supp. 2005) and 708-831(1)(b) (1993), her conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
| State v. Richardson, NO. 26173,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, March 29, 2006 , Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Town, NO. 27730,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
