LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Hawaii - April 13, 2007

  
In the Interest of B Children: C.A.-A.B., NO. 27936, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A father's appeal of a family court's decision awarding the Hawaii Department of Human Services foster custody of five children was moot where the findings of fact and conclusions of law limiting the parents' visitation were vacated and thus, the case did not have substantial collateral consequences on the father.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In the Interest of K Children: D.K., NO. 27514, NO. 27515, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Although Haw. Rev. Stat. § 587-34(a) could have been interpreted to mean that a GAL was counsel, the language of § 587-34(e) clearly indicated the opposite because of the use of the language "a guardian ad litem or counsel appointed pursuant" to the section.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jou v. Schmidt, NO. 27880, 27881, 27882, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A circuit court had properly dismissed a physician's appeal of an insurance commissioner's order granting the insurer summary judgment on the physician's claim for no-fault benefits where he admitted that he had not sought administrative review within 60 days as required by Haw Rev. Stat. § 431:10C-212(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Awana, NO. 27145, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: As to defendant's conviction for commercial possession, the prosecution proved an aggregate weight of 25 pounds or more, in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1249.4, by testimony establishing that a proper chain of custody was maintained, that the seized marijuana was weighed, and by a criminalist testifying that the weight was 27.05 pounds.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Holau, NO. 27794, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion with respect to the victim's statements implying that defendant hit her on a regular basis where he failed to object to one statement at the time it was made, the trial court had issued a cautionary instruction to disregard the statements, and the jury was presumed to have followed the instruction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Spillner, NO. 27722, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Tampon, NO. 26912, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's convictions for first-degree burglary and second-degree robbery were affirmed where the trial court had informed of his right not to testify, instructed the jury to separately consider the counts in the consolidated cases, given the jury a definition of theft, and properly sentenced him in conformance with Sixth Amendment case law.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.